The ten annotation rules
Classical games only · 505,367 analyzed games · boards show the position before the move
RuleConditionsPer gameExample
??Blunder
EV* loss* ≥ 30 pp*
0.16
. . b r . . . k
q . . . . . r p
p . . P . . . R
. . p B . . . .
. . . b . Q p .
P . . . . . . .
. . . . . . P P
. . . . . R . K
Tal – Smyslov, 1959
40...Rgd7??
Candidates 1959 (Bled/Zagreb/Belgrade)
?Mistake
EV loss ≥ 13 pp
1.47
. . . . . q . .
p . . . . r . k
. . R . . . p .
. . b P p . . .
. . P p P . . p
. . . Q . . . P
. . . B . . P .
. . . . . r R K
Karpov – Kasparov, 1987
50...R7f3?
World Chess Championship 1987 (FIDE)
?!Inaccuracy
EV loss ≥ 8.5 pp
1.52
r n . q . r k .
p . . . n p p p
b p . . p . . .
. N p p P . . .
. . . P . P . .
. . P . . N . .
P P . Q . . P P
R . . . K B . R
Alekhine – Nimzowitsch, 1930
10...Qd7?!
San Remo 1930
!!Brilliant Sacrifice
best move
SEE* ≥ 3
EV after ≥ 0.7
EV gain* ≥ 3 pp
0.11
. . . . r . k .
p . p b . p p p
Q b p . r . . .
. . . . . . . .
. P . . . . . .
. . P q . B . .
R . . P . P P P
. . B . . R K .
Paulsen – Morphy, 1857
17...Qxf3!!
New York 1857
!Surprising Move
best move
EV after ≥ 0.35
EV gain ≥ 2 pp
surprising move
0.67
. . . . r r k .
. b p R . p . .
. p q . p Q p .
p . . . P . . p
P . P R . . . P
. . . . . N K .
. . P . . P P .
. . . . . . . .
Short – Timman, 1991
33.Kf4!
Tilburg 1991
Hard Move
best move
difficult position*
EV after ≥ 0.35
EV gain ≥ 2 pp
0.47
r . r q . b k .
. n . b . p . p
. . . p . n p .
. p . P p . . .
. P p . P . . .
. . P . B N N P
R . . Q . P P .
. B . . R . K .
Karpov – Unzicker, 1974
24.Ba7!
Olympiad 1974 (Nice): Final A
Sacrifice
best move
SEE ≥ 2
EV after ≥ 0.35
EV gain ≥ 2 pp
0.34
r . . . r . k .
. p q . . p p .
. . p . . n . .
. P N n . . . .
. . Q N . . b .
. . . . . . P .
. . . R P P . .
. . R . . . K B
Reti – Alekhine, 1925
26...Re3!
Baden-Baden 1925
Minor Sac
best move
SEE ≥ 1
EV after ≥ 0.35
EV gain ≥ 2 pp
surprising move*
0.28
. . k r . . . r
p p p . q p p p
. . p . . n . .
. . b . . b . .
. . P . p P . .
. P . . P . . .
P B Q P B . P P
R N . . K . . R
Larsen – Spassky, 1970
10...Ng4!
USSR vs Rest of World 1970
!?Speculative Sac
not best
SEE ≥ 1
EV loss < 5 pp vs. best
contested position*
surprising move
0.24
r . b . . r k .
p p . p p p . p
. . . . . b p .
q . . . . . . .
. . . n P . . Q
. B N . B . . .
P P P . . P P P
R . . . . R K .
Sharpening Move
not best
EV loss < 3 pp vs. best
win and loss chance up ≥ 2 pp
contested position
0.06
. . . b . . . .
p . . k . . . .
. . n N n . . .
p . p N p . . p
K . P . P . p P
. . B P . . P .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
Larsen – Bobotsov, 1969
47.Nf7!?
Palma 1969
*EV = expectation (see XPA)
*loss = negative change in expectation after move played
*pp = percentage point
*SEE = Static Exchange Evaluation, the net material the move leaves en prise, in pawns: 1 = pawn, 2 = exchange, 3 = minor piece
*gain = positive change in expectation after move played
*surprising move = policy gives less than 5% probability
*difficult position = expected loss ≥ 6 pp
*contested position = EV before between 0.3 and 0.7 with draw probability < 0.85
chessds.com